Did you know that members who log in don't see ads?
Sign in with E-mail
Help your friends by answering these questions
Did you know that members who log in don't see ads?
So I’m going off this assuming no weapons are being used. And I honestly say 1 man 1 women (maybe 2 if my argument doesnt make sense). I’d say 1v1 because a lot of men are taught to not hit women. So the man would likely hesitate or hold back despite being stronger. The woman could use a lot of strength but the dude is still stronger so I feel like it’d be a pretty even fight based on that. But 1 man vs 2 women also makes sense as well.
Assuming that neither team has gear or training that would put them at the advantage 1 man: 2 women. Men are naturally stronger than women and have a bigger mass meaning the men would have the natural advantage against the smaller weaker women This was in now was meant to offend anyone I am trying to address this from an unbiased standpoint, I am assuming that this is not saying that either gender is preparing or use omg weapons also race could matter due to how our bodies have evolved in different climates and stereotypes but I am assuming they are the same race
1 man :2 women seems fair.
1:1 because even though men are stronger on average most women have weapons such as nails purses and high heels.
Women. Men are stronger but women fight nasty and always have something on them to defend themselves
These are average people. Not the rock vs. belle delphine.